Bibliography: Medieval Disability and Animal Stuidies

By Patricia Rodriguez, Les Pickrell, Jenna Ring, Aidan Webster, Taete Bost, Charley Jess, Sydney Thuss, Matt Blackett, Ali Henes (Eckerd College)

Buhrer, Eliza. “‘If in Other Respects He Appears to Be Effectively Human’: Defining
Monstrosity in Medieval English Law.” Monstrosity, Disability, and the Posthuman in the
Medieval and Early Modern World, eds. Richard H. Godden and Asa Simon Mittman, Palgrave
Macmillan, 2019, pp. 63-83.

Chace, Jessica. “Animal, Vegetable, Prosthesis: Medieval Care Networks in the Lives of Three
English Saints.” Exemplaria, vol. 29, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2017.1284367.

Classen, Albrecht. “The Monster Outside and Within: Medieval Literary Reflections on Ethical
Epistemology. From Beowulf to Marie de France, the Nibelungenlied, and Thüring von
Ringoltingen’s Melusine.” Neohelicon, vol. 40, no. 2, 2013, pp. 521–42,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-013-0198-5.

Godden, Richard H., and Asa Simon Mittman. “Embodied Difference: Monstrosity, Disability,
and the Posthuman.” Monstrosity, Disability, and the Posthuman in the Medieval and Early
Modern World, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 3–32.

Kostuch, Lucyna, et al. “Ancient and Medieval Animals and Self-Recognition: Observations
from Early European Sources.” Early Science and Medicine, vol. 2019, no. 2, 2019, pp. 117–41,
https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-00242P01.

Lembke, Astrid. “The Animal as an Object of Interpretation in Pre-Modern Christian and Jewish
Hermeneutic Traditions – an Introduction.” Interfaces, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.13130/interfaces-05-02.

Patterson, Serina. “Reading the Medieval in Early Modern Monster Culture.” Studies in
Philology, vol. 111, no. 2, 2014, pp. 282–311, https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2014.0008.

Refael-Vivante, Revital. “The Dual Role of Animals in Medieval Hebrew Animal Fables:
Animals as a Subject and an Object.” Ehumanista, vol. 42, 2019, pp. 110–23.

Richard, Olivier. “Le jeu des aveugles et du cochon. Rite, handicap et société urbaine à la fin du
Moyen Âge”, Revue historique, vol. 675, no. 3, 2015, pp. 525-556.

Steel, Karl. “Centaurs, Satyrs, and Cynocephali: Medieval Scholarly Teratology and the
Question of the Human.” The Ashgate Research Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous, eds. Asa Simon Mittman and Peter J. Dendle, Routledge, 2012, pp. 297–314,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315241197-22.

Swenson, Haylie. “Attending to ‘Beasts Irrational’ in Gower’s Visio Anglie.” Monstrosity,
Disability, and the Posthuman in the Medieval and Early Modern World, eds. Richard H. Godden and Asa Simon Mittman, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 163-181.

Weinreich, Spencer J. “How a Monster Means: The Significance of Bodily Difference in the
Christopher Cynocephalus Tradition.” Monstrosity, Disability, and the Posthuman in the
Medieval and Early Modern World, eds. Richard H. Godden and Asa Simon Mittman, Palgrave
Macmillan, 2019, pp. 181-207.